#Battle of the 5 kings skin

Now Naaman, captain of the host of the king of Syria, was a great man with his master, and honourable, because by him the LORD had given victory unto Syria: he was also a mighty man of valour, but he was a leper. Naaman, general of the army of the king of Syria, was a great man with his master, and honourable: for by him the Lord gave deliverance to Syria: and he was a valiant man and rich, but a leper. Naaman was a brave soldier, but he had leprosy. The LORD had helped him and his troops defeat their enemies, so the king of Syria respected Naaman very much. Naaman was the commander of the Syrian army. Now Naiman, the captain of the host of Syria, was a great man before his master, and highly respected, because by him the Lord had given deliverance to Syria, and the man was mighty in strength, but a leper. Now Naaman, captain of the host of the king of Syria, was a great man with his master, and honorable, because by him Jehovah had given victory unto Syria: he was also a mighty man of valor, but he was a leper.ДЄnd Naaman, Captain of the army of the King of Edom, was a great man before his Master, and praised among persons, because by him LORD JEHOVAH performed salvation for Edom, and the man Naaman, a mighty man of power, was a leper.

#Battle of the 5 kings skin

The man was a brave warrior, but he had a skin disease. Naaman, commander of the army for the king of Aram, was a great man in his masterвЂ™s sight and highly regarded because through him, the LORD had given victory to Aram. The man was a valiant warrior, but he had a skin disease. Naaman, commander of the army for the king of Aram, was a man important to his master and highly regarded because through him, the LORD had given victory to Aram. He was also a man of courage, but he was a leper. Now Naaman, commander of the army of the king of Aram (Syria), was considered a great man by his king, and was highly respected because through Naaman the LORD had given victory to Aram (Syria). The man was also a valiant warrior, but he was a leper. Now Naaman, captain of the army of the king of Aram, was a great man with his master, and highly respected, because by him the LORD had given victory to Aram. The man was also a valiant warrior, but afflicted with leprosy. Now Naaman, commander of the army of the king of Aram, was a great man in the view of his master, and eminent, because by him the LORD had given victory to Aram. He was also a mighty man of valor, but a leper. Now Naaman, commander of the army of the king of Syria, was a great and honorable man in the eyes of his master, because by him the LORD had given victory to Syria. Now Naaman, captain of the host of the king of Syria, was a great man with his master, and honourable, because by him the LORD had given deliverance unto Syria: he was also a mighty man in valour, but he was a leper. And he was a mighty man of valor, but he was a leper. Now Naaman, the commander of the army of the king of Aram, was a great man in his masterвЂ™s sight and highly regarded, for through him the LORD had given victory to Aram. He was a mighty man of valor, but he was a leper. Naaman, commander of the army of the king of Syria, was a great man with his master and in high favor, because by him the LORD had given victory to Syria. But though Naaman was a mighty warrior, he suffered from leprosy.

The king of Aram had great admiration for Naaman, the commander of his army, because through him the LORD had given Aram great victories. He was a valiant soldier, but he had leprosy. He was a great man in the sight of his master and highly regarded, because through him the LORD had given victory to Aram. Now Naaman was commander of the army of the king of Aram.